What's new
Steroid Source Talk

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts.

Highest % purity generic

GGC

Member
Verified Source
Joined
Oct 27, 2022
Messages
72
Reaction score
47
This was from the tinted blacktops which I bought an absurd amount of. I think they were $73 a kit when I bought $10 at a time and shipping was like $30
That is a fantastic result, but I have to say I am skeptical. A perfect 6mg/18iu with that high a purity, I'd really be interested in having them consent to Janoshik to release the raw data and product photo. If you showed me that lab report and covered up the client/sample name my gut would tell me "that's a vial of Serostim 6mg, definitely!"

Again, I really do hate to sound like a skeptic. Like I said above we have seen a few very good 98-99% results (that couldn't be duplicated in repeat testing) so it is entirely within the realm of possibility that the report linked is reflective of that actual product batch, and it may very well be consistent throughout, but boy - when I see 6mg and 98%+, I hear hooves and think horses not zebras - and that screams Serostim to me.

I'm very open to being surprised! Hopefully it is real and more importantly hopefully it is repeatable. Too often we see vendors skate by reusing their best test report. With multi-vial testing you can really see how common it is to have somewhat substantial variance between "best" and "worst" vials.
 
Last edited:

dantespeak

Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2020
Messages
68
Reaction score
30
That is a fantastic result, but I have to say I am skeptical. A perfect 6mg/18iu with that high a purity, I'd really be interested in having them consent to Janoshik to release the raw data and product photo. If you showed me that lab report and covered up the client/sample name my gut would tell me "that's a vial of Serostim 6mg, definitely!"

Again, I really do hate to sound like a skeptic. Like I said above we have seen a few very good 98-99% results (that couldn't be duplicated in repeat testing) so it is entirely within the realm of possibility that the report linked is reflective of that actual product batch, and it may very well be consistent throughout, but boy - when I see 6mg and 98%+, I hear hooves and think horses not zebras - and that screams Serostim to me.

I'm very open to being surprised! Hopefully it is real and more importantly hopefully it is repeatable. Too often we see vendors skate by reusing their best test report. With multi-vial testing you can really see how common it is to have somewhat substantial variance between "best" and "worst" vials.
That test was a blind test from some random person on meso. This one is what TP posted so there’s some variation in but it’s pretty close to the blind test results. He also just posted in this group chat that the testing results for what would be the new mauves was close to 96-97% and that they’re not gonna buy them and try again and if the results are the 98% and up that they’re known for he’s gonna put brown tops on them.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0927.png
    IMG_0927.png
    877.8 KB · Views: 11

goodfella

Active member
Joined
Jan 30, 2024
Messages
122
Reaction score
65
That is a fantastic result, but I have to say I am skeptical. A perfect 6mg/18iu with that high a purity, I'd really be interested in having them consent to Janoshik to release the raw data and product photo. If you showed me that lab report and covered up the client/sample name my gut would tell me "that's a vial of Serostim 6mg, definitely!"

Again, I really do hate to sound like a skeptic. Like I said above we have seen a few very good 98-99% results (that couldn't be duplicated in repeat testing) so it is entirely within the realm of possibility that the report linked is reflective of that actual product batch, and it may very well be consistent throughout, but boy - when I see 6mg and 98%+, I hear hooves and think horses not zebras - and that screams Serostim to me.

I'm very open to being surprised! Hopefully it is real and more importantly hopefully it is repeatable. Too often we see vendors skate by reusing their best test report. With multi-vial testing you can really see how common it is to have somewhat substantial variance between "best" and "worst" vials.
Well thats like me saying Idk, I can't help but be kinda skeptical of you at this point now, as here's another gh vendor questioning another gh vendors product that tested higher than his lol... He's been around for quite some time and has always had a high standard. Anything is possible and see your point, but I think if you followed him you might think differently. Funny enough he recently just posted something that touches on this exact topic.
 
Top