- Joined
- Feb 18, 2018
- Messages
- 2,142
- Reaction score
- 1,012
@freetopin Again, you’re highly confused.
You’re free to make whatever post you want. I’m not in the business of censorship.
However, in order to you to make your claim you need to understand a few things and make them clear in your post:
Source credit for bloodwork is not board policy. You keep saying this no matter how many ways I refute. Board policy is the way I review the bloodwork. Credits are a separate matter entirely. Leading to the next point…
Sources DO NOT need my approval to give a credit.
“Approval” of bloodwork means it counts; that would be a positive affirmation of bloodwork for the source.
Not approved means the bloodwork was bad in some way. Draw time, bad multiplier implying possibly underdosed gear, wrong formatting, account too new, not enough activity, bad title, etc. Not approved is negative/needs scrutiny.
If the bloodwork is not approved, there’s an issue or error to be corrected somewhere, whether that be the user’s side or the source’s.
You’re free to make whatever post you want. I’m not in the business of censorship.
However, in order to you to make your claim you need to understand a few things and make them clear in your post:
Source credit for bloodwork is not board policy. You keep saying this no matter how many ways I refute. Board policy is the way I review the bloodwork. Credits are a separate matter entirely. Leading to the next point…
Sources DO NOT need my approval to give a credit.
“Approval” of bloodwork means it counts; that would be a positive affirmation of bloodwork for the source.
Not approved means the bloodwork was bad in some way. Draw time, bad multiplier implying possibly underdosed gear, wrong formatting, account too new, not enough activity, bad title, etc. Not approved is negative/needs scrutiny.
If the bloodwork is not approved, there’s an issue or error to be corrected somewhere, whether that be the user’s side or the source’s.